Payday loans car insurance

Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC

Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC

  • 2010 delivers fast and light comprehensive online threat protection, guarding your PC, network, and your identity without slowing you down
  • Gives you greater insight into downloaded applications and files by telling you where they came from, if they can be trusted, and how they may impact your PC’s resources and performance
  • Warns you of dangerous web sites and suspicious sellers so you can surf and shop online with confidence
  • Stops online identity theft, viruses, spyware, bots and more–guard your PC, online activities, and your identity against all types of threats
  • Proactively blocks hackers and prevents dangerous software from downloading to your computer when you surf the web

2010 has numerous new and improved features. It includes Insight Network which uses Symantec’s global intelligence network to provide real-time online protection from the newest threats. The Safe Web identifies unsafe and dangerous Websites right in your search results along with System Insight that provides features and easy to understand system information to help keep your PC performing at top speed. Featuring the Identity Safe

Rating: (out of 7 reviews)

List Price: $ 49.99

Price: $ 17.99

Norton 360 3.0 1-User/3Pc

  • 360 3. provides automated, comprehensive protection for your PC and online activities–the industry’s fastest, lightest, most complete solution
  • PC defends against viruses, spyware, botnets, and more, protecting your computer and all your online activities
  • Identity protection safeguards you against online identity theft, letting you shop, bank, and browse with confidence
  • PC Tuneup keeps your PC running at peak performance, which makes your computer run faster and helps keep it running like new
  • Automated backup and restore protects your important files from loss–safeguards your irreplaceable photos, movies, music, and more

360 Premier Edition 3. eliminates the need for any additional , performance optimization and data backup & restore products. Truly a breakthrough in PC protection, 360 Version 3. provides a hassle-free user experience. It includes the strengths of Antivirus 2009 with Antispyware for online threat protection and powerful features similar as those of SystemWorks Premier Edition for backing up your data securely as well as continuously optimizing your PC for pe

Rating: (out of 273 reviews)

List Price: $ 79.99

Price: $ 23.00

Find More Norton Products

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Related posts

Tags: , , ,

10 Responses to “Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC”

  1. ccbear says:

    Review by ccbear for Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC
    Rating:
    This software very powerful and price less. But the only thing I complain is it delete all my suspect virus files without notice me, let me lost lots of executive files.

  2. Richard I. Cronkhite says:

    Review by Richard I. Cronkhite for Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC
    Rating:
    This product will not work with some software. If you use Freelance Graphics (Lotus) and have “hyper-links” in your presentation, it will freeze up while “updating links”. They can not even fix it by removing the product and they claim that there are no problems (somewhere in India). This happened with a previous product of theirs as well. If you installed their worm protection, it locked ZoneAlarm pro up. It could not be removed! That time they admited it and that is how I was able to figure out the problem with NIS 2010.

    Great Security, if you have time to personally work out the bugs.

    (Their Client Firewall does work with Freelance Graphics.)

  3. Dale Dillinger says:

    Review by Dale Dillinger for Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC
    Rating:
    I’ve had this product before, and this was a renewal. It is very good

  4. Maxpfeiler says:

    Review by Maxpfeiler for Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC
    Rating:
    As usual this Norton Internet Security was easy to install. I have used this product for years and each year there is advancement in what it accomplishes. The bottom line is my computer has been kept free of viruses.

  5. C. Orengo says:

    Review by C. Orengo for Norton Internet Security 2010 1 PC
    Rating:
    Norton still slows down my start up, but I feel secure using it. Tried a few others, always come back to Norton.

  6. S. Kim says:

    Review by S. Kim for Norton 360 3.0 1-User/3Pc
    Rating:
    I first started using Norton 360 on my laptop running Windows XP and it was pretty awful. It would always “ding” an alert or notice on every legitimate web site or online retailer. In addition, my laptop became terribly s-l-o-w. So bad in fact I thought it was my memory, and even with a memory upgrade it was crawling along. After that experience, I evolved into a new laptop running Windows Vista and bought Kaspersky Internet Security. This was a total disaster. Kaspersky, in my experience, is total junk! EVERY web page and browsing experience was blocked with so many “threat” notices that I had to disable it just to use Internet explorer. Not even Mozilla Firefox had a chance. So, in need of relief, I saw this “new” version of Norton 360. I removed the Kaspersky and installed Norton 360 Version 3.0 (As of April 8, 2009 be careful what you buy, when I was shopping, many stores were still carrying the older 2.0 version.) I did cautiously backup my system before installing this, and after installing it; it pretty much works as described. It will keep log-ins, and passwords stored within its program for various sites, like Amazon.com for example and these are password protected.

    What is more noticeable to me, over my past experience with Norton 360 Version 1.0 is the “diet” the software has undergone. On my laptop, again running Windows Vista, (two years old) there does not appear to be any lag, or sluggishness, and you could argue it is faster than when Kaspersky was running. At first I thought the protection was not running, but it is, and I don’t notice it.

    As far as options, there is a Premier Version 3.0 and a “plain” Version 3.0. The main difference, as you see on the back of the box, is an upgrade in online storage. I have not tried to use the online storage and don’t plan on using it. I already have a big enough external back-up drive and I do not like uploading my personal or sensitive files for someone else to hold onto. But it’s your call in the end.

    Pros: “light” software, hardly noticeable, compatible with Windows Vista, and able to securely remember log-ins and passwords

    Cons: Having to buy this every year

    Hope this review helps!

  7. Solypsys says:

    Review by Solypsys for Norton 360 3.0 1-User/3Pc
    Rating:
    Pros:

    -Intrusion prevention/Auto-protect (Firewall)

    -Virus scanner with the largest database among all virus scanners

    -Heuristics scanner that makes even Kaspersky jealous

    -Other security features (Email scanning, browser settings check, network address check)

    -File backup

    -Disk defragger

    -Temp file removal

    -Registry scanner

    -Does all of the above automatically while your computer is idle

    -Has a full gamut options to fully control what 360 can and cannot do

    Cons:

    -Price

    -Backup will only backup files, it will not make an image of the disk. This means that if you have a hardware failure you will have to reinstall windows + every program you own

    -People claim it’s a resource hog but my Norton 360 is currently consuming 00% CPU cycles and 10mb RAM. It does consume a lot of resources during a scan but that’s why you’re supposed to let it run automatically while your computer is idle

    -People claim it is hard to uninstall. This though is false, Symantec has a program on their website that will uninstall it completely for you or you can use a program like Uninstall Tool

    In order to copy all of the features of Norton 360 with different programs you would need to pay for an internet security application, backup application, and a “PC Tuneup” application. I actually didn’t want to use Norton but it saved me money over buying those three programs individually and allows them to run automatically saving me the trouble of setting up run schedules and making sure my computer is on during those scheduled times.

    I’ve installed Norton 360 on 3 different computers and none of them have experienced any of the problems that all these 1-star reviews did. One of the computers is even a POS laptop with barely any resources and it runs fine.

    Norton 360 does not contain or use the program “PIFTS.exe” which is the purported executable that Symantec uses to “spy” on people.

  8. R. McAdams says:

    Review by R. McAdams for Norton 360 3.0 1-User/3Pc
    Rating:
    I have a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Computer Science with a Minor in Security and Forensics. I feel qualified to speak about this product as a professional in the field. I am not an “expert” because I do not work in the “Virus” scanning or software field, and I do not work for Norton. But I am a professional in the field of Computer Science and Computer Security.

    Note: I am putting the word “virus” in quotes, to emphasize that the word is a media creation, and is not entirely indicative of the real behaviors and traits of malicious codes and programs. In biology, an organism can “catch” a real virus by simply being near it and/or exposed to it. In the world of computer security, active acceptance of a “virus” is needed, in order to “get it.” This can include running unknown downloads, browsing shifty websites with an insecure browser, etc. Security threats can come from a multitude of sources: websites, downloads, programs, scripts, macros, etc. They are called all sorts of names: “spyware,” “malware,” “viruses,” etc. All of these names and categories try to order and control something which is by its very nature uncontrollable. It is better to call is all “malicious code” and stop trying to categorize it. But, for the purposes of this review, “virus” refers to a type of malicious computer code which is generally intended to do harm to a target computer, and/or to ferret out financial/personal information, and/or capture control of a computer to allow the “virus” writer to use it for illegal purposes later.

    First of all, let me state that I generally don’t use any form of “Virus” security software. I generally don’t trust them, and I do not like their subscription model of business. Over the years, I have used: AVG, McAfee, Norton, and lesser known products to CLEAN an infected system I was called in to look at. But, I do not use the products myself on my own systems. I generally use a simple firewall and on some more critical systems I will also use a behavior monitor to flag and block suspicious behaviors from software. If one follows good computer security practices, security software above a firewall and possibly a behavior monitor (such as from ZoneAlarm Pro or PC Tools “ThreatFire” or SpyBot’s “TeaTimer”) are all you need. Even with all of the security software in the world, you STILL have a chance of being hit, especially from a “zero day” threat. Because of that, the only way to 100% protect your data, is to perform regular backups.

    However, I have to give Norton credit for giving this product a good “college try.” First of all, they are doing their best to protect against “zero day” threats. A “zero day” threat is a threat on the day it is released. This is usually a problem, because most security software, especially “virus” scanners tend to rely on program “signatures” — the names, and code and makeup of specific virus files. The “virus” is most dangerous on the day of its release, because the security software hasn’t been updated to recognize it yet. In the past, updates to get new “signatures” used to happen on a daily or even a weekly schedule. This left a window of opportunity to get hit before the signatures were updated. And frequently, once you have been hit, the “virus” will disable your security software, or render itself invisible to it. Norton 360 v. 3.0 is attempting to combat this by literally checking for updates every 5-10 minutes or so. Additionally, Norton sets up an automatic backup process which can be used to restore critical files after a disaster. This will not help if your entire hard drive gets nuked by a virus, but it is better than nothing.

    So, how did I test this product? I threw the proverbial kitchen sink at it, that’s how. Note, this product requires Windows XP SP 2 or greater to install. The first test system I attempted to install it on was an original XP system with no updates. It refused to install (as do AVG and MacAfee for that matter, just to be fair). So, I installed it on a test system which I slightly more used than the older test system. Once I had installed it, run its updates, and run all of the scans, etc. (it found nothing, which is what I expected it to find), I was ready to try to break it. I networked a known corrupted system to the test system, and opened the network and file sharing protocols. I began accessing files, moving known infected files to the test system, etc. Basically, I gave the infected system the chance to take over the test system. I also loaded known virus files of various types (including Unix/Linux viruses which have no affect on Windows systems) to see if Norton would spot them, and what it would do with them.

    Sure enough, the infected system started trying to get into the test system over the network. And I started receiving pop-up messages from Norton telling me over and over again that “such and such virus, or process, or whatever” had been blocked. It also dug up, within minutes, all of the known “virus” files and folders (even the Unix/Linux ones) I had loaded. Okay, so it was good at blocking bad stuff from a few months ago, and known “virus” files, even from other operating systems. What about zero day stuff? I hit a “hacker” website with an unsecured version of Internet Explorer (v. 5) which is known to try to inject into insecure browsers. Norton blocked it. I then downloaded the source code to a “virus” the “hacker” community was promoting, and compiled it and ran it (I altered the source code so it wouldn’t actually harm any of the files on the test system if Norton failed), and sure enough, Norton had a signature for it, and blocked it. So, Norton 360 was able to repel attacks from a known infected agent. It was able to catch all of the “virus” files I presented it with, it was able to repel attacks from a known bad website, and it was able to catch and repel a self inflicted attack from a “zero day” “virus.” Not bad. Not bad at all. For someone like my mother or grandmother, this is exactly the kind of product they need. It takes care of the details, and leaves them (more or less) safe.

    The other features Norton 360 v. 3.0 has are fairly trivial. It has a disc optimization wizard (read: defrag), and a cleanup wizard (read: delete temporary files). Most of its PC Tune-up tools are either included in Windows, available for free online, or unadvisable. Their registry cleaner seems OK, but any time you mess around with the registry, you are asking for trouble. The backup function works fine, and can be scheduled to run automatically. And the identity protection stuff works fine too. If you are running Mozilla’s “Firefox” you already have most of the tools that the identity protection offered by Norton offers, such as identifying insecure websites, etc. It has too many features too really rate and enumerate individually. I tested the major ones that an average user is going to care about.

    Now, on to my only major gripe about Norton 360 v. 3.0 (and all security software suites for that matter). They claim, “Norton 360 3.0 [is] the industry’s fastest, lightest, most complete security solution” and they claim that, “[it] is the fastest and lightest all-in-one PC protection solution available on the market today. [...] using significantly fewer system resources, so it won’t slow you down: [...] It uses less than 10 MB of memory.”

    Well, true enough, it generally didn’t use more than 10MB of RAM. But who cares about RAM usage? Most PCs on the market these days come with 1GB of RAM, or more. It is CPU usage, which is the problem. And just like every other security software suite like Norton which I have used, 360 v. 3.0 is a resource hog, just like all the others. Scans consistently topped 50% CPU usage. The test system is a 3.2GHz, dual core processor, with 2GB of RAM, running Windows XP SP3. When scanning, or doing anything CPU intensive, the computer basically freezes, or runs very slow, until the CPU has been released. This behavior is true of all security software, so Norton cannot be dinged too hard for this, which is why I am only subtracting 1 star from the review. However, they COULD have been a bit more honest in their claims and advertising. The thing is a resource hog, plain and simple. The main process running in system memory is pretty much always claiming 5-15% of the CPU, and whenever it is doing something more involved, then it regularly pings the CPU to 50% or higher.

    My only other complaint about the product is how chatty it is. By default, it will pop-up and bug you whenever it has ANYTHING to report to you, including “tracking cookies” (which are not a real security threat.) This gets annoying after the 100th pop-up telling you it has blocked something. This behavior can be modified in the settings, but it is on by default. Norton also will ignore you if you restore a file which it has identified as a “virus,” and it will re-delete the file when it encounters it again. This is a problem if you are a computer security professional, and part of your job is to archive and analyze security threats. I had to encrypt the files I wanted to keep, in order to prevent Norton from finding them, and trying to delete them. Good job to Norton on being so aggressive, but they need to make it easier for a professional to override the program.

    So, overall, I rate the product a 4/5, with it losing a star for its less than honest advertising about how “fast and light” it was, and for the other obnoxious behavior listed above. I will not be continuing to use the product, because as I stated previously, I don’t use any major security products. But, from the tests I ran, I would be perfectly happy to recommend this product to any family member or anyone in the general public, so long as they had the money for the product itself, and to pay for the updates subscription.

  9. darkclown says:

    Review by darkclown for Norton 360 3.0 1-User/3Pc
    Rating:
    Norton 360 saved me a great deal of problems and potentially years of lost data. Dealing with several trojans at once was too much of a problem for my previous anti-virus program, AVG 8.5 (a free program that I thought was good). In reality, I had been living with the trojans for a few weeks without knowing (since AVG never caught them — though to be fair, neither did Spybot S&D, Anti-Malware, Windows Defender, or Ad-Aware). You get what you pay for, in the end.

    I installed Norton 360 thinking I might have many problems installing because I already had a virus, but the installation took less than 5 minutes and within 30 minutes all the viruses, trojans, and rootkits had been removed from all three infected computers. This is an excellent product. It runs quickly, unobtrusively, in the background, and just WORKS.

    I highly recommend this product; it saved me a lot of time and problems. Though I would not recommend buying it from Amazon (kind of expensive). Staples and Office Depot frequently run specials on this product and I got mine for $30 from Staples.

  10. Wilson Ramsay says:

    Review by Wilson Ramsay for Norton 360 3.0 1-User/3Pc
    Rating:
    I’ve never been a big Norton fan because it would let the occasional spy ware or virus through. When my subscription expired I updated to 360 ver 3. It would have been better to download a virus. My computer in general and the internet in particular ran very, very slow after the installation. Not only that, but I lost use of Google and access to several websites.

    Norton support was none existent. I waited on hold for 2 hours and finally gave up without speaking to tech person. The only way to get my computer back was to uninstall 360 and do a system restore.

Leave a Reply